Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts

Monday, 6 December 2010

facebook's Gift

Look what facebook made (sorry I can't show the picture of it, I can't get it to work). I’m not sure what this nicely set out group of words says about me. I wouldn’t have chosen any of these facebook statuses (or is that stati/statusi/stata/statum?) as representative of me or my 2010. Sometimes it’s interesting to see yourself how others see you, and maybe this is how I’m seen. I had forgotten the Sherlock TV series, and the passing of Michael Foot. My twin obsessions of Richard Herring and quilting hardly get a mention. The highlight of the year, Edinburgh Festival is absent, as is worry of the year (Dad’s big operation) and big change (starting nursing studies). All of the things in the cloud had their day though, and I wish I had a cloud as a memento of every year to remind me that shopping in the rain is as soon forgotten as Easter eggs are consumed.
This week’s statum (I’m settling on that plural) have been about the essay I started ten weeks ago. Inevitably, I would have done better to start this week because it has become a mammoth literature review rather that a two page navel gaze which is what I’m now convinced is required. The 18 year old me had it right, spend the term drinking, watching films and reading irrelevant books. Start the day before it’s due, any mark over 45% is a waste.

Friday, 5 November 2010

A Time to Keep Silence and a Time to Speak

There is a Christian prayer or poem with a line about deciding when to speak and when to be silent. I don’t know where it’s from, the history of it, or the context. It’s there though in my subconscious, ready for use as the need arises, even though I’m not religious. That’s culture for you, and school assemblies.
Twice yesterday, there were choices to be made. To speak, or not to speak. First off, in a class about feeding and mouth care. I was feeling slightly unwell, which contributed to me failing to raise a paw. The lecturer explained how she had been told that bibs are not used in learning disabilities services due to the childish appearance. Frankly, this is far from accurate (although I’d agree they are avoided in the same way that spooning food into people is if it can be). Later, I wondered about why, given decades of learning disability experience, I had kept quiet. After all, it is a small but important issue and relates to situations which are wrestled with by many of the professions of people who care, irrespective of who they care for. It had come down to not wanting to show off, and to wanting to give others to the chance. I’m aware that’s patronising, but I only do honesty here. In the end, I dropped an email to the lecturer concerned, and she replied very graciously. I wasn’t sure how it would be received, thinking I might be wasting her time, but I’m glad I did because it got it off my chest. Each trade develops its cultures and customs, even if there's no logic there's usually a reason. In case you're interested, here's what I wrote:
Although I'm studying mental health nursing now, I worked in learning disabilities services for twenty years and saw the progress away from bibs (although I never worked anywhere where there was an absolute ban).
 In the long stay hospitals it was part of the culture that most people were put into bibs irrespective of need. The practice continued into the early 1990's when people were transferred into the community, it was challenged under the new values of normalisation and choice. A further problem was that people were often put in bibs at breakfast and left in them all day. As many people who need help to eat also often produce excessive saliva (or fail to manage it) they would become soaked in drule as the day progressed, becoming sore around the neck and getting skin infections. The appearence and smell were, indeed, quite offensive.
 I've certainly worked with people who lived with their families who used bibs comfortably, and used bibs for some people as the need arose. I was surprised to hear of the rigid attitude but I wonder if it is a local issue brought on by perhaps over-rigid, if well meaning management.
 
Later in the evening, I responded to an ‘emergency’ facebook appeal for an opinion about reality TV from a woman 40+. Ahh, irony. It is so easy to speak about something that don’t care about that I offered immediately, wrote something, found out I had needed to comment on the impact on children, and then wrote a bit more. I was genuinely happy to help, and it might be in the paper. If not though, here’s my almost midnight thoughts on the impact of reality TV on children:
My teenage daughters got me hooked. Talking about reality tv is one of the things we can discuss without treading on each-other's toes. In some ways it has brought us together, not quite as a family though as my husband feels excluded. 
The ones with a focus on music and dance may well influence some young people growing up to think about a career in the media, but I'm not sure that's a bad thing. My eldest used to like the Supernanny programmes, qualified in childcare and is now at university intending to be a social worker. She might have achieved this without Jo Frost, but I have a feeling that Supernanny was a force for good.

Sunday, 8 March 2009

Sunday 8.3.09


Quiet Sundays are the best. Nick and I had a bit of a heart to heart which cleared the air, and a companionable lunch.


I spent the afternoon watching the DVD of Dave Gorman's America Unchained. This seems to be a diary of a car breaking down and the search for petrol. I'm amazed the man can put himself through these adventures, they mostly seem miserable and quite lonely. I was browsing his fans, they seem to think he's a wacky, hip, matey guy. I can't see him that way, and looking at his replies, neither does he. I liked the way the programme has been filmed though. It has a photographic quality to it, especially the second half (camera person was swapped half way through). Now I'm thinking about it, it comes to me that most of the filming was done at sunrise and sunset (the times when the car wasn't moving), after all, how much road can you film? Perhaps this is what gives the appeal, all those pink skies.


After watching it, I was taken by a fit of guilt. The thing is presumably his livelihood, and there it all is in segments on Youtube. I e-mailed him to let him know, but as Nina pointed out, Dave will, surely have people who check Youtube for him to get things taken down.


I had two simultaneous conversations on Facebook today. That's never happened to me before, it was like being at a party, but without the crisps. I'm not very good at making a go of that kind of conversation though, I fear offending people, and I'm ashamed of my poor spelling.


Rich and I had a nice chat. He has got his scholarship for his MA so will probably go to China. I'm so proud of him. We agreed to go to the Edinburgh festival too, and maybe we will.